The following guidelines explain why the YMCA Model Supreme Court brief is written in the style shown in the sample. Briefs that do not follow these guidelines will be returned for correction.
Briefs will be submitted in the following format:
1. Typewritten or word processed on white 8-1/2 x 11 inch paper.
2. 1.5 or double spacing between lines is generally used, as demonstrated in the sample.
3. Typeface must be a legible font such as Courier or Times, generally 10 to 12 point size on a word processor, or pica type (10 characters per inch) on a typewriter. Excessively small or large fonts are difficult to read.
4. One inch (1") margins should be used.
5. Uncopyable or illegible briefs will be returned for correction.
6. Briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages, excluding the title page and table of contents, but including all other elements. (note: It is doubtful that a quality brief can be developed in fewer than 6 pages.)
7. All pages except the title page and contents shall be numbered, the page after the Table of Contents being page 1.
8. To facilitate copying, original briefs must not be bound by more than one staple in the upper left hand corner.
9. Signatures of both team members must appear at the end of the document in the location indicated in the sample.
Briefs must contain the following elements in the order listed:
1. Title Page: The title page shall be in the form shown in the sample brief that follows this section. It contains:
- The words IN THE YMCA MODEL SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
- The Case number (or numbers). Case number(s) will be noted in the case packet.
- The name of the appellant and the respondent as stated in the case
- Identification of the brief as being that of the Appellant or the Respondent
- Court from which the case originated
- Notation that an Oral Argument is requested
- Name and address (either home or school is acceptable) of Attorneys appearing before the court. (In this case, list the members of the team. In a real brief, the opposing council is known in advance and their names are also included, something not possible in the Model Supreme Court)
2. Table of Contents: The table of contents in the Model Supreme Court is a separate, single page that lists each element of the brief (excluding itself and the title page) and the page on which each element begins. Because the Argument is the most complex part of the brief, the headings and subheadings used within the argument section should also be listed in the contents with the corresponding page number. Usually this is done in outline form as shown in the Sample Brief.
3. Table of Authorities: the table of authorities in the Model Supreme Court is a list, no more than one page long, of all materials used to support the argument. It includes every page in the brief where the particular excerpt is found. It is similar to the bibliography of a term paper, except that the citation format is different, and cases are usually grouped by type: state statute, case law, Constitutional provisions and other materials. (See sample)
This list not only verifies the sources used by the attorney, but is useful for the Court and for other attorneys to quickly determine what cases, statutes or other materials are being cited, and to easily locate these references in the original research materials used in preparing the case. Correct citation format shall be used as described later in this manual.
Note: participants are not to cite any additional material in their cases other than what is included in the case packet. This is not to say that students aren't allowed to pursue additional resources such as dictionaries of legal terms, guidebooks on brief writing, or manuals on the preparation of oral arguments. But they cannot cite or refer to any source as authority for their briefs or oral arguments other than the resources provided. Factual statements or arguments of law must be able to be backed up by the resources in the case packet.
4. Statement of the Issues: This is a very short introductory statement of the legal issues or points of law involved in the case. It tells the Justices precisely what legal issues the attorney team wants the Court to decide. These statements should be phrased to help one argue FOR a particular conclusion rather than simply against the other side. In the Model Supreme Court cases, there will be two primary legal issues (generally, each member of the team will take one issue to research and prepare an argument).
These issues are stated in question form and should be phrased in such a way that a "yes" answer will support one's position. These statements are very short, generally no more that one sentence per issue, and are generally placed just before the Statement of the Facts.
The appellant may phrase an issue this way:
"Did the trial court err in holding that...?"
The respondent may phrase the issue in the same case this way:
"Did the trial court correctly conclude that...?"
5. Statement of the Facts: The Statement of the Facts is a retelling of the facts from the client's point of view. However, the facts provided in Model Supreme Court Cases are not to be added to nor disputed. For a Model Supreme Court brief, this section should be about one page long, and not more then two pages.
Attorneys explain the situation in a way that helps their client. This is a very important part of the brief that sets the stage for the argument, and should be presented both to help the court understand the case and show the client in the best possible light. But, remember not to assume facts not given, and do not distort, change, or add to the facts!
For example, here is how parties in a real Supreme Court appeal used the Statement of Facts in different ways to support their positions:
The Appellant/Defendant's brief began this way: "[John Doe] was a mentally ill nineteen year old when he participated in a robbery with a juvenile female..."
The Respondent/Plaintiff's brief began: "Since [John Doe] pleaded guilty..."
6. Argument: This is the core of the brief. Students may find the argument to be somewhat like writing a persuasive essay with lots of research references. It presents support for the issues presented earlier. Solid research is used to back every part of the argument. Arguments must be well-organized and convincing; attorneys will win or lose their case based on the quality and substance of what is said.
Each point the team wants the court to consider in deciding the case must be described, and the reasons explained with appropriate references to research materials used, and text citations inserted as frequently as needed. Citation format examples appear later in this manual.
In the Model Supreme Court, arguments for each of the two issues should be at least one, but no more than three pages each. The total argument section should not exceed six (6) pages. Attorney teams are advised to have each member take one issue to research and prepare that portion of the argument for the brief. Remember: the total brief, except for title page and table of contents, must stay under the ten page limit.
As an example of how an argument could be written, imagine the following scenario where a team wanted to argue the point that Judicial Immunity protected a County Sheriff from liability in a particular case. That portion of the argument might be written like this:
The doctrine of judicial immunity is firmly entrenched in American law as held by the US Supreme Court when it stated "a like immunity extends to other officers of government whose duties are related to the judicial process." Barr v. Mateo, 360 US 564, 569, 79 S. Ct. 1335, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1434, 1440 (1959). Accordingly, the doctrine of judicial immunity shields Sheriff Innocent from any liability arising from his release of the defendant, because he was acting upon the order of Judge Knowsit.
As shown above, the team first explains the rule of law, then shows how it applies to the particular case. If needed, a short direct quote is included to help the Court recall the precedent or law in question.
The team then makes additional arguments to demonstrate that Sheriff Innocent was not liable. They continue to cite relevant cases, statutes and constitutional provisions that further bolster their overall argument. (Reminder: participants are not to cite any additional material in their cases beyond what is included in the case packet.)
Structurally, each part of the argument is first directed at supporting the various issues of one's own case, then also opposing the contentions anticipated to be brought up by the opposing party.
Stylistically, the argument is written in forceful, active, positive language. (A team wants the court to rule FOR their client, not simply against the opposing counsel.) The argument also forms the core of one's oral presentation and will be used by the Justices to make their decision.
The writing of the argument, as shown in the sample brief, uses headings and subheadings to begin each section of the narrative and help clearly organize the argument. The same structure of headings and subheadings should be summarized in the table of contents. The idea is to do everything in terms of both form and substance to help the Court understand the reasonableness and logic of the argument, and thus decide in one's favor.
The following outline style is one commonly used when writing arguments in New Mexico:
I. ISSUE (bold and all caps)
A. Main Point (Bold, Underlined, First Letter Caps)
1. Supporting Points (Bold, First Letter Caps)
Note: This is also handy way to prepare one's notes for the oral argument. It is more effective to have an outline to refer to than the written text. One reason to outline an oral argument is because Justices are free to interrupt an oral argument and ask questions at any time. Questioning can take an oral argument off track very quickly. Therefore, an outline is better than a prepared speech because it allows the Attorney a more effective way to remember what points have been covered and makes it less likely that someone will lose his or her place.
7. Conclusion: This is where the Attorney team summarizes their argument and specifically states the result desired. The conclusion in a Model Supreme Court brief can be as short as one sentence, and should not exceed a single short paragraph. The signatures of the Attorney team follow the conclusion, as shown in the sample.